THE
TEACHER & SOCIETY
'ERT's 3rd Conference for Teachers, London, 30 November
2006'
What is the essence of being a
good teacher? Why is it so hard to do today? How does society
help or hinder teachers?
Most of the 75 people who attended our
conference this time were heads and teachers from state primary
schools in the London area – plus some from secondary
and independent schools, and from further afield, trainee
teachers, governors and others with personal or professional
involvement in education.
Our theme was ‘The Teacher & Society’ –
What do teachers give? What are the social realities that
make teaching more difficult? Are pupils less attentive?
Or parents less supportive? Does society help or hinder
teachers? How have teachers been respected in the past?
And how do they contribute in developing countries?
So many questions – and not all to be answered conclusively
in one day!
MORNING SESSION SUMMARY
‘ Does society hinder teachers? What can be done
about it?’
After a warm welcome to all from David Boddy, a founding
trustee of ERT and head of St James Independent School for
Senior Boys, we heard from our 3 morning speakers.
Libby Purves, well-known journalist, author and broadcaster
on education, had to pull out of being our opening speaker,
due to the sad death of her son – which she has written
about in The Times.
Robin Woodhead, who took over the first slot, was chosen
as a first-rate speaker and experienced head of the widely-praised
Worksop Priory Church of England Primary School in Nottinghamshire.
He is a cousin of the former chief inspector of schools,
Chris Woodhead, but tells us that he and his cousin disagree
on a number of things!
WHY IS GOOD TEACHING SO HARD TO DO TODAY?
Some major reasons and ways to address them:
· Children are bombarded with sensory stimuli from
all quarters. As a result they require significant stimulation
to engage them with their learning.
A good teacher needs to be dynamic, an Oscar-nominated performer.
· At home children are increasingly adept at talking
above the sound of CDs, Game Boys, TV and PCs, often several
at once.
As a result:
a) children ignore a lot of sounds around them including
people talking to them.
b) they are poor at listening, at being quiet and at taking
a quiet time to think.
c) they compete openly for being heard in the classroom.
Consequently the teacher has to apply a far more stringent
code of conduct than previously needed in order to maintain
appropriate behaviour for learning.
· Children’s home lives are more disrupted.
A greater incidence of separation and divorce means an increasing
number of children affected by disintegrating family units.
There is a clear correlation with performance in school during
the initial period of upset.
· Parenting is poorer. Higher levels of teenage pregnancy.
Often young parents are totally unprepared to take up the
significant responsibility of rearing children. Too often
they lose control of their children and expect the school
to manage the resulting behavioural problems.
Run parenting groups.
· Respect for authority from parents has declined.
Often the parents will blame the school for behavioural problems
that in fact have begun at home.
Heads must support and protect their staff to ensure they
do not suffer harassment or abuse. Once the school’s
stance is understood, incidents will diminish.
Parents want their children to stay at a good school and
will therefore back off.
· Children are less respectful.
They mirror unacceptable traits witnessed at home and in
the community.
What works at Priory school is a zero-tolerance policy for
any form of antisocial or disrespectful behaviour.
The School Council presents a charter to pupils each term
to reinforce expectations.
RW tells children ‘when you are talking to any member
of staff you are talking to me’.
· Over-prescription by the state. Schools suffer
from initiative overload which puts severe pressure on management.
This cascades down onto teachers and then children.
Create ‘Not to do’ lists rather than ‘To
do’ lists.
Allow more talking and thinking time which will have a positive
effect on learning.
Jim Knight, the Minister for Schools, said in May 06 that
schools should have a period of stability, ‘We can
do more by doing something less’.
· There has been too great an emphasis on SATs, exams,
data and results. Profiles are more preoccupied with data
than children. Creative subjects have become marginalised – the
very subjects that spark enthusiasm, creativity and enjoyment.
Robin thinks that teachers in our schools are beginning
to regain lost ground. With the full support of Heads, they
should be encouraged to ‘take those risks’ again
that make education the spontaneous and exciting learning
experience it always was and should be for our children.
If it goes wrong, no matter: learn from it.
Good teaching requires energy, drive, vision, knowledge,
courage, dedication and the ability to hold the attention
and imagination of children. And at the same time, move them
on to the next level of their understanding.
Teaching is one of the most challenging but rewarding professions.
It continues to be an exciting profession and those who feel
the call should not be afraid of putting the ‘good’ back
into teaching.
Teachers should stop worrying and do the job they were born
to. That is, to excite children about their learning and
make it a meaningful and enjoyable experience.
‘Teachers who love teaching, teach children to love
learning.’
Our second speaker was Kim Nataraja, of the World Community
for Christian Meditation.
THE PROBLEM OF ATTENTION IN EDUCATION AND WAYS TO ADDRESS
IT
Kim’s presentation drew on her experience both as
the International School Co-ordinator for the World Community
for Christian Meditation, and her 34 years work training
teachers in colleges of education. She began by emphasising
how the lack of attention is one of the major constant factors
of the world we live in, characterised by a technological
bombardment that creates a fragmented, superficial arena
where people are easily bored and need constant change and
variety of stimuli. She spoke of how the idea of doing several
things at once is admired, in contrast to sustaining a deep,
concentrated attention on whatever work is in hand. It is
this latter point, the power of attention, that is in fact
the key to success. ‘You never forget the people who
give you undivided attention. It’s a gift, a beautiful
gift in a somewhat mad world’, she emphasised. The
need for teachers is to become a still point of focus and
attention for the children.
The World Community for Christian Meditation has developed
a scheme for teaching both children and their teachers techniques
of meditation, and Kim has recently headed up a new project
based in Townsville, Australia, where nine schools are introducing
their children to meditation practice. It is already highly
successful. This is a simple technique based on a silent
repetition of a word or phrase - a holy word or a phrase
from scripture. Their premise is that NOT paying attention
is learned behaviour, so it can be unlearned.
The work they are doing is supported by scientific evidence
from research carried out on young children that reveals
that during the years between 2-5, a child operates almost
entirely from the ‘right’ brain where the alpha
and theta brain waves are dominant, and which is considered
an area of ‘higher, or unity consciousness’.
As the ego naturally develops, and the child learns to become
more independent, beta waves, the ‘thinking’ waves,
become more pronounced. This is the development of the logical,
rational thinking of the left brain. It is this that is emphasised
at the primary level in the work of the National Curriculum,
and through this side of the brain competitiveness, aggression
and assertiveness is developed. The right brain activity – emotion,
feeling, creativity and intuition – tends to be down-played
and is not always valued, Kim suggested. She spoke of encouraging
a kind of playful attention, an intelligent attention that
seeks to find the joy in things, and quoted Simone Weil’s
statement, ‘Joy in learning is as indispensable as
breathing in running’. It is this kind of attention
that is the spiritual aspect of the human. Furthermore, through
practising this single pointed attention, a child or person
can come to experience compassion, a connectedness of love.
Kim finished her talk by reminding us that anything that
increases experience of love and compassion has to be of
value in today’s world.
The final morning speaker, Dr Anthony Naylor, is Principal
of St Mary’s University College, Twickenham, where
a third of the students are trainee teachers. He also sits
on the General Teaching Council for England. He told us that,
if anything, the degree of commitment among new teachers
has improved in recent times.
WHO IS COMING INTO THE TEACHING PROFESSION?
St Mary’s was established in 1850 to provide education
for poor children of Catholic faith, most of whom were second
generation immigrants.
Working ahead of its time, (Westminster Cathedral was not
to be built for another 44 years), it sought to provide service
to the community and saw teaching as a divine calling.
Dr Naylor told us that the context of the initial training
has changed with different routes into the profession now
available.
There are now greater incentives to become a teacher and
more competitive entry which has resulted in higher quality
training with positive promotion of teaching as a career.
To use Arthur’s words, there are plenty of ‘Golden
Hello’s’ available.
The Post Graduate Certificate of Education (PGCE) courses
at St Mary’s have waiting lists and have been the recipient
of Ofsted inspections every year for ten years. As a result,
the College receives good promotional status with the Training
Development Agency.
Interestingly, the National Foundation for Education Research
states as its motivational criteria for teachers that they
will want to:
- Work with children,
- Expect intellectual stimulus,
- Make a positive contribution to society.
A survey undertaken by the students however, showed they
were, perhaps, more interested in the salary, promotion possibilities,
and holidays, although working with children did get a mention!
All in all this was deemed not to have changed much over
the years.
Of more concern, is the fact that despite recruitment being
strong, the sciences, (particularly physics and chemistry)
and maths, remain unpopular subjects.
Also, as the table below shows, the recruitment of males
in 2006, especially at primary level, is severely unbalanced
in relation to females.
The average age for a PGCE course is now 28 with several
students having done something else first, often in business
or law.
* * * *
Following questions and discussion with the speakers, we
then all moved to the refectory in the basement of the building,
to sit down and eat an excellent cooked lunch – provided
by Art of Hospitality, and free of charge to participants,
like the conference itself.
AFTERNOON SESSION SUMMARY
What do good teachers contribute to society?
Valery Rees, scholar and broadcaster, was our opening speaker
in the afternoon. She has just completed her PhD thesis on
Marsilio Ficino, the great spiritual teacher and neo-Platonist
of the Italian Renaissance, and she is a leading member of
the Renaissance Department of the School of Economic Science.
She’s also a regular panellist on ‘In Our Time’,
Melvyn Bragg’s BBC Radio 4 discussion programme.
What follows is our summary of the first part of Valery’s
very full and extensive talk.
To read the full text, click here. We recommend it for a
very illuminating and inspiring read.
THE STATUS OF TEACHERS FROM PLATO TO THE PRESENT
In an ideal world, pupils are eager to learn. Teachers are
keen to teach, and to share learning with their pupils. Society
honours the teacher’s work, and new pupils flock to
him or her.
Is this your daily experience? Have you had a taste of this,
at least?
Why is it so rare? Is it a dream? Or is it the natural state
of affairs?
How was it in the past?
Can we regain today some of that honour and enthusiasm?
In Ancient Egypt, family members or neighbours were the
informal teachers of practical skills. But formal education
was reserved to the priests – literature and clerical
skills, science, astronomy, medicine and accountancy flourished.
The Pharaoh was the highest priest, and all priests had high
status. Similarly in early Chaldean society, in the Middle
East, the Magi – for instance, the Three Kings of Christmas – had
charge of knowledge of nature, philosophy, and priestly functions.
So teachers had status, but only for being priests. They
might have been good teachers, or they might have been bad.
Ancient Greece had a more secular education, linked to the
welfare of society as a whole, the ‘polis’. Some
schools taught reading, writing, music or mathematics. Some
taught skills of power-mongering and persuasion. Some teachers
are reported as exemplary – such as Pythagoras, who
was held in great reverence, and whose school for adults
taught mathematics, reasoning, and moral values. He also
gave much attention to geometry, philosophy, and restoring
the soul through music.
Plato was a teacher of the young, using methods drawn from
Socrates – of dialogue between teacher and pupil. Great
respect for Socrates has lasted right through Christian Europe – respect
for his integrity (teaching what he knew to be true), for
his humility and generosity (seeking nothing for himself,
and helping students to the limits of his ability), and for
dedication and a sense of duty. He understood education as
training pupils to use their minds, to understand, and to
think for themselves.
(…………Valery went on to tell us of
the different nuances to being a good teacher in the societies
of the Indian and Judaic traditions, in the Dark Ages and
the Renaissance, right through to England in the 19th century.
Here are some of the inspiring quotations from the 20th century
with which her talk ended, and her inspiring finish. Do go
on to read her text in full, with all its wisdom.)
Mahatma Ghandi said :
‘
The way a society values its teachers reflects its fundamental
assumption about itself.’
Abraham Joshua Hempel said :
‘
Everything depends on the person who stands in front of the
classroom…. the teacher is the creator of the future
of our people.’
Joseph Schwab said :
‘
The teacher wants his students to possess a knowledge or
skill in the same way that he possesses it, as a part of
his best-beloved self…… He wants to convey not
merely what he knows, but how he knows it and how he values
it’.
Valery said ‘I wish good fortune in this to each and
every one of you.’
Dr Steve Commins was our last speaker. With wide experience
advising on children in the international relations area,
for aid and development charities, and for the World Bank,
Steve is now an academic, with posts at the University
of California and in Washington DC.
HOW EDUCATION TRANSFORMS SOCIETY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
Education is not an industrial assembly line. Education
is about preparing for life not achieving a particular grade.
All Steve’s experience as parent, as a teacher and
working at the World Bank confirms this.
Western education systems have become dangerously obsessed
with processing & packaging students to get through exams.
His experience across the world had taught him that education
needs to concern itself with each of the following if it
is to be of any use in developing complete human beings:-
1. each child is unique and each child’s path is different – education
has to have a wide enough view to see this;
2. civilization – a good idea, as Gandhi remarked
- but it depends on teaching the whole person;
3. moral responsibility – responsibility for the consequences
of one’s actions - one of the most important things
to teach today especially in the context of one country
giving assistance to another. (E.g. do you feed the refugees
who
may have warlords amongst them or do you let them starve?
There is no clear right or wrong answer.)
4. There will always be conflict – part of the human
condition – the important thing to teach is peaceful
and constructive ways to resolve conflict. This is a vital
human skill.
5. The importance of critical thinking.
It has been orthodox belief since the Second World War that
economic growth will sooner or later deliver a good society
for all. This is no longer so strongly believed. Spending
money does not always buy results. Education is not ‘value
neutral’. High enrolment in schools is of little use
if little learning is going on, if an irrelevant curriculum
has been imposed from on high or if corruption means that
only a small part of the school budget is actually spent
on education.
Economic development alone is not enough. The core of all
development is HUMAN development. Yes, economic development
requires education, if it is to be sustained. Around the
world, the chief aim has been to raise children out of poverty.
But now we need to think about developing the young – so
that they can truly develop their own societies in the future.
When societies are in crisis or an emergency, the first
thing to do is to provide food, medical services, and shelter.
But the very next priority is to set up schools, however
informal. This gives the reassurance of normality to children,
and to their families. Even teaching just simple life skills,
with the teacher setting a good example of informed helping,
it gives hope for future improvement.
We all know that, often, children know more than we do,
and sometimes teach us much more than we teach them. Fostering
tolerance, and respect for knowledge, promoting social cohesion
and peace – these are good aims for education. Values
are involved in all good education – not just educating
as many as possible, but aiming for excellence of learning.
Dr Commins concluded with these lessons from a world wide
view of education:-
1. The role of the teacher is vital – wherever there
are good, well motivated, well supported teachers, schools
flourish all over the world. For example, this is as true
of Cambodia as of the USA.
2. The obsession with tests in the developed world is closing
off areas of spiritual, emotional and physical development
for children which education ignores at its peril
3. Education should also be about access and inclusion – if
society is to learn how to look after the disabled properly,
it needs to do so at schools.
* * * *
Again there was a question and discussion session for the
speakers to respond to points from the audience. And following
Steve Commins’ widening of our vision to the whole
of humanity, we all had a cup of tea, and left for home with
a spring in our steps.
If you would like to come to one of our conferences, please
email admin@ert.org.uk. Both audiences and speakers often
tell us that at the end of the day, instead of feeling tired,
they feel more energetic and uplifted than when they came
in! We look forward to meeting you.
With grateful thanks to rapporteurs Richard Barnes, Ann
David, Debra Levy, Dorothy Venables and Laura Woodhead. And
of course to the speakers and delegates.
Education Renaissance Trust, December 2006
|